Sungai Batu Archaeological Site on in-situ data

he Ancked Sungai Batu Society seeks to educate members of the general public who are curious about Sungai Batu but have not studied archaeology. In order to explain what is discovered at the Sungai Batu Archaeological Site, our Association prints a guide on A4 paper.

This by the way is a Translation

This is what is referred to as frying; and maintain frying. One objective exists. To shake the elderly people's discovery. To ascertain the date of the finding or the year's data, the Sungai Batu Archaeological Site should be used as a guide. For instance, cemeteries, gravestones, and ships. We are unable to simply touch objects without following the correct procedures. If we only come across a tombstone, we can definitely state that it belongs to the King so-and-so with a specific date after feeling the shape, examining the carving motifs, and glancing at the stone's colour. If so, the Association, as the newest and most audacious group, ought to request that the International Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory in the US, Japan, and Korea close down in a letter since it is the most important one. Even though they are not using appropriate technology, the dates have changed and the site has been disturbed, making the dating inaccurate.

We ought to follow our nation's example. If an undated inscription stone is discovered, we can determine the date by comparing the likelihood that it happened. If a tombstone is discovered, we inspect and touch the spot where it was discovered. Green moss is younger than black moss. Observation is preferable to useless microscopic study. It's alright. The fact that we discovered it is what matters.


In a similar vein, we do not rely our interpretation of the findings at the Sungai Batu Archaeological Site on in-situ data, which is irrelevant and subject to change due to human intervention. Finding objects ON the ground rather than buried beneath it is what matters. The effects of the holes dug to retrieve the objects buried beneath the earth cannot be seen today, and it only represents a portion of what happened. We've already strayed from standard historical practise. We have to dig out every hole if we discover one that has been dug out. What we have discovered is this.

Allahu. What mental category do we belong to? What justifications are we using?

That's it. The Ancked Sungai Batu Society seeks to educate members of the general public who are curious about Sungai Batu but have not studied archaeology. In order to explain what is discovered at the Sungai Batu Archaeological Site, our Association prints a guide on A4 paper. The best part is that our printed paper for the general public is more credible, pertinent, and likely to be accurate than the director of the center's research's results when it comes to telling the story of all the sites.

The public is indeed the intended audience for reference materials. The general public will then comprehend why surface observations are more trustworthy than excavated dirt sent to a lab. Don't get me mistaken, though. I'll use one as an illustration. Two PhDs currently oversee the Ancked Sungai Batu Society, and three more are pursuing their doctoral degrees. Since the archaeological site was still a palm oil plantation, all of them have been engaged. Additionally, this organisation trains its tour guides under the direction and instruction of the principal researcher at Sungai Batu rather than at their own discretion.

The best course of action is to communicate the knowledge based on what has been discovered, and one radiocarbon date, 788 BC, has been found. Why is this date still present? What makes it a radiocarbon age, and why?

Can we ask UNESCO to confirm every gravestone we discover? Can it be done?

2023 AD in Relau.


Awalludin Ramlee

413 Articles/Blog posts 🔥

Thoughts